A Most Excellent Rant!

This comment was left on my post about Utz Cheese Balls. It’s way too well-written for it to remain hidden under a cheese ball post! For heaven’s sake, “roadsassy”! Show some pride in your work!! Post your rant where it’ll be seen!

Here. I’ll help. Now don’t ever say I never did anything for you.

New comment on your post #827 “A Barrel of Cheese-y Deliciousness”
Author : R Sassy (IP: 69.133.42.144 , cpe-69-133-42-144.cinci.res.rr.com)
E-mail : roadsassy@gmail.com
URI :
Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=69.133.42.144
Comment:
You are such a slut – you not only admire the hag whore Linda Hirshman, you approve of “rights” for the enemy. Oh – that’s right – there is no enemy in ‘la la land’.

As a woman I can say unequivocally that bitches like you and Hirshman are a profound argument for the Chinese practice killing of female children. I certainly hope nothing issuing from your dead womb ever sees the light of day.

So why don’t you just go pick the fetal tissue out of your teeth or write a treatise in support of NAMBLA -an outfit that I’m sure you’d readily defend – and stay out of the public discourse – you freaking malignant whore .

Yeah, but how do you feel about Utz Cheese Balls? They’re great, right?

Posted by RebeccaHartong on June 29, 2006 under Uncategorized

5 Comments to Read


  1. Eek – what a nutter!!! Although I kind of like the idea of ‘la la land’.
    Oh – and those cheese balls did sound good!

  2. Matt on June 30th, 2006 at 4:55 am

  3. Hm. A rant for sure, but “well-written”? Not really (though I suspect your tongue is firmly planted in your cheek). Your respondent starts as follows:

    “You are such a slut – you not only admire the hag whore Linda Hirshman, you approve of “rights” for the enemy. Oh – that’s right – there is no enemy in ‘la la land’. ”

    Slut. Hm. Perhaps the writer misunderstands the definition of the word. Are all those who disagree with the writer sexually promiscuous females? It seems unlikely that the level of promiscuity required to earn the title “slut” would leave one enough time to maintain a blog, much less do the reading and research necessary to develop a well-reasoned opinion.

    Next — “hag whore”. Seems a contradiction in terms, to me. If one is truly a “hag,” whoredom is probably not an option.

    *A note on the above insults: Isn’t it interesting that the writer’s idea of “really, like BAD insults” includes allusions to the sexuality of another woman? Slut, whore, bitch…the ultimate ad hominem responses of someone who is quite incapable of responding to an issue in any sort of intelligent way.

    “As a woman I can say unequivocally that bitches like you and Hirshman are a profound argument for the Chinese practice killing of female children. I certainly hope nothing issuing from your dead womb ever sees the light of day.”

    “Dead womb” — again the reference to reproduction and sexuality.

    “So why don’t you just go pick the fetal tissue out of your teeth or write a treatise in support of NAMBLA -an outfit that I’m sure you’d readily defend – and stay out of the public discourse – you freaking malignant whore .”

    LOL. And finally, a reference to NAMBLA and whoredom (although this time “freaking malignant” whore). Oh, and references to cannibalism as well, what with fetal tissue in the teeth and whatnot.

    So. A rant indeed, but it definitely needs work if it is going to be in the “well-written” category. I suppose it might work (in an abbreviated form) on a bathroom wall, i.e. “You are a slut!” or “You are a malignant whore!” (the additiion of “freaking” might make it too lengthy for such use), but as a blog comment it fails miserably. Even as an ad hominem attack it is childish at best, lacking creativity and wit.

  4. Anonymous on June 30th, 2006 at 8:55 am

  5. Great deconstruction! And nutter is right.

    Maybe you’ll get a repeat performance for posting their email and IP addresses. Ha ha! Looks like that IP address is out in your neck of the woods, so maybe this person is actually one of your neighbors. Have you been outside roasting children during your midnight masses again?

  6. Michael Lewis on July 1st, 2006 at 6:13 am

  7. Oops. My bad. The IP is in Herndon, but the name indicates Cincinnati. That’s a bit of travelling to just annoy someone… Guess they’ll have to come out this way.

  8. Michael Lewis on July 1st, 2006 at 6:15 am

  9. Have you been outside roasting children during your midnight masses again?

    Tastes like chicken!

  10. Rebecca Hartong on July 1st, 2006 at 8:17 am

Add A Comment